I loathe the practice of cold call telemarketing. The Australian Do-Not-Call Register is absolutely awesome. Unfortunately the government lets charities through, which I handle by politely stating that I have a personal policy to never respond to this method of marketing, and hang up. I donate to World Wide Fund for Nature, Green Peace and the Salvation Army off my own bat, I don't need any help thanks.
I used to get two or more telemarketing calls a week, one time I had three in a night, but in the many months since registering my number at do-not-call, I have only received one telemarketing call which was a sleazy southern Asian guy who was pretending to have dialed the wrong number and wanted to know if he could talk with me anyway. I had a bit more to say to that guy than my usual polite spiel.
The do-not-call register is a major success.
I am not opposed to filling out surveys. When not in a rush at the shops, I will happily sit down and be interviewed or answer questionnaires. I seem to be targeted for this, which I believe may expose a bias in that method of research - asking people less likely to cause you problems.
I loathe spam junk email, but I subscribed to SMSpup which spam you with semi useful stuff from categories of companies that you can pick and in return will allow you to send free SMS messages from their web site. Not too bad. One of the SMSpup adverts was for OpinionWorld who have competition prizes for answering surveys. I almost passed this up but must have been particularly bored that evening. So every now and again I get an email from OpinionWorld about a survey they'd like me to fill in. They are easy enough to fill in when I am calming down from a heavy day at work. Occasionally you get tossed a gem survey like the one that sent me lollies, surveyed me about what I thought ... and paid me money to do it. Paid to eat lollies! That's special! I used the lolly money to buy the first two seasons of "The Shield" from DVDOrchard. Woohoo!
SMSPup just sent me an ad asking me to join another survey company called "ORU" (Online Research Unit). I thought "Why not? I can has more lollies?" but I read the terms and conditions. Check out the section titled "The National Do Not call Registry" at the bottom of their old terms and conditions. Basically you gave them and any company who joins them, the right to bypass the do-not-call registry.
So I wrote an email complaining about this to the organisations that ORU touts as to their legitimacy. The Association of Market & Social Research Organisations (AMSRO), European Association of Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR) and the Australian Market and Social Research Society (AMSRS) talked it though with "The ORU" and they have removed the clause from their terms and conditions. Hurrah for the power of the cranky user! And to the willingness of The ORU to change.
I still think that the "Do Not Call Register Act 2006" needs to be tightened up so that registrants can indicate that they want to never authorise calls under any circumstances.
|Prices at 2 Mar 2008 in Australian dollars.|
However I occasionally want a print in my office or to decorate my home walls or to give to others. In these cases I will usually head to Office Works, Harvey Norman or BigW and use the fine printing services there. Recently I signed up with HP's SnapFish with 50 prints for free, and they turned out nice and seem quite reasonable for 19 cents a print.
Then my brother in law came over and he mentioned a printing system that drastically reduces the printing costs of your home printer. The Continuous Ink Supply System (CISS) has a big container of ink sitting next to your computer with little tubes that run into specially modified versions of ink cartridges. The printing costs via CISS effectively makes your printer competitive with the retail printing services and much better value in some cases.
I have an old Canon IP4200, the CISS from RIHAC cost me $150 (inc delivery from ebay) and is the equivalent of 10 sets of ink cartridges which would cost from $1000 to $1300 for genuine Canon cartridges, or from $600 to $750 for non-genuine/refills (Inkjet Wholsale). A HUGE saving. The CISS has easy refills that make for even cheaper per print cost. The CISS refills are about $65 delivered, for 10 cartridge sets equivalent. $65 instead of $1300. ($Australian)
Another way to look at it : get some good 6x4" photo paper from somewhere like OfficeWorks and you can get about 20cents a print (depending on the cost of the paper), but the real value is in printing A4 or 8x12"; with some excellent 250gsm high gloss paper (I got a 50 pack of Kodak Premium Photo Paper, 250gsm gloss for $30) you can print A4 for under $1 (ink & paper), or $2 if you go for the uber expensive Canon Photo Paper Pro Super High Gloss. Under half that of the retail printing service.
Which brings me to the downside of the CISS for the IP4200. CISS is a bugger to install for Canon. You have to remove the chips from the original cartridges and place them on the CISS. You have to install silicon seals, tape the lid sensor down, install a metal arm, transfer ink out of the air balance chamber, and figure out how to reset the alert system. None of which is difficult and the instructions provided are very good. The process takes a while, requires you to read carefully, wear gloves, use a stanley knife very carefully, operate a soldering iron, and use a syringe. The process is not as scary as it sounds but it sure isn't as simple as just clicking the cartridges in.
The great news for other printer makes is that you don't have to bother with much of this. HP and Epson printers are much easier to install as the chips are included, no stanley knife to remove old chips or soldering iron to stick them on. I almost went out and bought a new Epson because of this.
I'm not sure any of this is approved by the printer manufacturer so warranty issues are questionable. But with the low price of printers these days, I'm not really concerned with getting the system repaired. Let's face it, after using the CISS once, I could easily buy 4 printers with the money I save.
Another potential flaw in the plan is that some third party inks last nowhere near as long as genuine inks. Check out your supplier's information on their ink. There has been much discussion and argument over standards for fade testing with ANSI designing a rating system to be announced in the near future. Check out Wilhelm Imaging Research, although there is some discussion about his testing conditions and anecdotal reports of reversed results. This area obviously needs more study. The ANSI rating will be a great help for we consumers. You can take steps to reduce fade or extend the life of the print by laminating, framing behind glass or using a photo spray. Also consider the environment you're placing the photo in; try to avoid direct sunlight, heat, humidity and smoke.
For comparison I created a printing price table. I took all due care to copy the details across but I can make mistakes so I strongly recommend you check out each sites web site for full pricing details. Information displayed here should be only taken as a rough guide, the CISS are my estimations only. There are all other sorts of factors including paper and ink quality that you need to take into account. Plus you don't have to buy and maintain a printer if you use the retail printing services, and you aren't restricted to size (generally).
I've just had the system for a little under a week and already I've produced dozens of 6x4 and a dozen A4 prints. The quality is amazing. My house walls are in for a shock.
Posted by Simon Forsyth at 10:46 am